The 3rd Rail of Disc Golf & Trans Women | Disc Golf Daily Podcast | 03/29
The 3rd Rail of Disc Golf & Trans Women explores a pressing debate in the disc golf community: should trans women be allowed to compete in the female division? The discussion centers around issues of fairness, inclusivity, and scientific evidence. Podcast host [name] delves into the complexities of trans women's participation, acknowledging legitimate concerns on both sides. They discuss how trans women who have undergone male puberty gain physical advantages that could put CIS women at a disadvantage. The conversation also touches on mental health considerations and the impact on society and sports organizations, such as the PDGA and ProTour, which are grappling with the issue. [Name] proposes a path forward that balances inclusivity with fairness for all participants, offering a nuanced approach to this emotionally charged discussion.
Exploring equality & challenges faced by trans women in disc golf with [player's name]. Listen now to our latest episode.
Watch on YouTubeVideo Transcript
hello race fans and welcome to dis golf daily today is Friday March 29th and it is time for Friday's thought for the weekend buckle up we are grabbing on to the third rail of disc golf should trans women play in the foo division do you do you think that trans women are really women and really female if you are willing to accept people as their gender then how can there even be a conversation there is no peer-reviewed scientific evidence that trans women have a statistically significant advantage over CIS women as a society that believes in human rights trans women need to be allowed to compete in the female division trans women that go through male puberty gain the advantage of larger bone structure larger lungs longer arms and more strength and speed there is no world in which it is fair for CIS women to compete against trans women also mental health concerns of trans athletes are important but should not result in the unfair treatment of CIS women both of these arguments are valid and society and sports have not yet come to a conclusion as to which will be followed in the long term this question is being put to the PDGA and the protour they are in a tough spot to be sure I'd like to address both sides legitimate concerns and propose a path forward that can be the least disruptive and the most inclusive until we determine the right outcome in this emotionally charged discussion also for clarity I will endeavor to use the terms CIS women and trans women CIS women are women whose birth sex matches their gender trans women are women whose birth sex does not match their gender CIS women are disadvantaged versus trans women I understand and accept that male puberty is different than female puberty I understand that male puberty in general results in larger bones muscles lungs and hearts also one very limited study of military personnel shows that trans women are able to maintain muscle mass easier than CIS women can build their muscle mass seemingly giving giving an advantage to trans women another study of a limited group of Australian distance runners showed that after 12 months of hormone therapy on average their performance dropped by 12% 12% is also the difference in times between men and women at the elite...
